Show summary Hide summary
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche cleared a major procedural hurdle Tuesday when the Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines to send his nomination to the full Senate, setting up a likely confirmation fight this week. The narrow 12-10 vote followed a late-week agreement that addressed GOP concerns about a controversial settlement and a disputed compensation mechanism tied to claims of political prosecution.
What changed to unlock the committee vote
Trump pressure over Greenland could tip Iceland’s EU membership vote
Full-body MRI concerns raised by Busy Philipps: what patients need to know
Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis had signaled they would block Blanche’s nomination unless the Justice Department provided firm limits on a settlement that had alarmed lawmakers across the aisle. On Sunday the department issued written clarifications and Blanche signed an order saying, in his words, that there is “no Fund,” language meant to remove ambiguity about any standing compensation pool.
The committee vote closed a week of tense negotiations but did not end the debate over the settlement’s scope or the broader question of the Justice Department’s independence.
- Rescission of the fund: Blanche’s order states the purported compensation fund does not exist and will not be left in place as a standing mechanism.
- Limits on tax protections: The DOJ wrote that any tax-audit immunity in the settlement applies only to claims already active at the time of the agreement and does not bar review of future tax returns.
- Who is covered: The department confirmed the tax-related release covers only the parties who brought that lawsuit — the president, two of his sons and the associated organization — not a broader class of people.
- Unresolved concerns: The order does not prohibit future administrations from issuing a new directive that could revive similar payments, a central objection of Democrats and some Republicans.
Why the vote matters now
The full Senate could consider Blanche’s nomination as soon as this week, making the outcome consequential for the Justice Department’s leadership and its posture toward politically sensitive investigations. If all Democrats oppose the nominee, Republicans can afford at most two defections — and that margin tightens if Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell remains absent.
Sen. Susan Collins announced she will oppose Blanche, citing actions she says “eroded the department’s independence.” Senators Lisa Murkowski and Bill Cassidy have not publicly committed one way or the other, leaving the final tally uncertain.
Democrats press for stronger safeguards
Democrats on the committee said Blanche’s written assurances fall short. They argue the order could be reversed by a subsequent attorney general and are calling for statutory language that would permanently bar any similar compensation mechanism.
Sen. Dick Durbin warned that the fund “can easily be revived” by a future departmental order, an argument that underpins Democratic demands for a legislative fix rather than reliance on administrative pledges.
Questions about independence and past actions
Blanche’s critics point to his prior role as a private lawyer for the president and to a string of Justice Department moves since he became acting attorney general that they say reflect an unusually close alignment with White House priorities. Those actions — and the unusual handling of a high-profile civil suit against a federal agency — have prompted scrutiny about whether he can lead the department impartially.
Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairing the committee, called the compromise a practical resolution to concerns and praised the cooperation that produced written clarifications and Blanche’s order.
What to watch this week
Key near-term developments include:
- Whether the full Senate schedules and holds a confirmation vote before the week’s end.
- Any additional statements from Senators Murkowski and Cassidy that could determine the final outcome.
- Democratic efforts to move legislation that would bar the kind of compensation mechanism critics fear could be revived.
The nomination fight encapsulates a larger test for the Justice Department: whether its leadership will be perceived as independent from the White House or as an extension of presidential legal interests. That perception — and the Senate’s vote — will shape how the department is viewed while it oversees politically charged investigations and high-stakes legal disputes.
