Show summary Hide summary
Prosecutors in Utah on Wednesday showed a brief video of Tyler Robinson taken after he surrendered to authorities, a rare public glimpse that coincided with a heated fight over whether a recorded interview with his roommate will be played for jurors. The dispute—over how much of Lance Twiggs’ statements can be heard in open court—comes as a judge prepares to decide whether there is enough evidence to bind Robinson over on an aggravated murder charge in the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Clip from the sheriff’s office and courtroom standoff
The silent video, played by prosecutors, shows Robinson in a room at the Washington County Sheriff’s Office wearing a T-shirt and a baseball cap. A state investigator testified that he spoke briefly with Robinson that night to confirm his name and birthdate.
National Guard bill for Washington presence through 2029: about $1.4B
US Army grants startups access to test ranges: fast-tracks weapons to front lines
But most of the day’s proceedings focused not on the clip itself but on whether jurors — and the public — should hear a recorded interview with Twiggs, who is Robinson’s roommate and described in court as his romantic partner. Judge Tony Graf signaled he would permit a redacted version of Twiggs’ interview to be played Thursday, then rule later in the week on whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed to trial.
What prosecutors say they have gathered
Prosecutors say investigators recovered a bolt-action rifle with one spent round and a towel wrapped around it in a wooded area near the place on the Utah Valley University campus where Kirk was shot. They allege the weapon is connected to Robinson and point to messages and notes they say show he targeted Kirk because of his views.
- Physical evidence: A rifle and a towel located near the shooting site.
- DNA testing: Analysts say DNA from the towel matches two people — Lance Twiggs and, likely, Tyler Robinson.
- Alleged communications: Prosecutors cite a text and a note they say indicate Robinson intended to harm Kirk.
- Witness statements: Twiggs was interviewed twice and granted immunity for his cooperation.
Defense challenges DNA and fairness concerns
Robinson’s attorneys have questioned the reliability of the forensic work linking him to the towel and weapon, pressing an FBI analyst about the methods used to reach a DNA match. Defense lawyer Michael Burt argued that the analyst could not positively match Robinson to the samples.
At the same time, the defense warned that playing Twiggs’ recorded statements in open court — and the inevitable media coverage that would follow — could prejudice potential jurors. They asked the judge to block the audio from public broadcast; so far that motion has not succeeded.
Forensic experts called by the prosecution pushed back, describing modern DNA testing as highly reliable. Lawrence Quarino, director of a forensic science program at Cedar Crest College, described the techniques used by law enforcement as the “gold standard” in the field, and an FBI analyst, Amanda Bakker, said that after Twiggs provided a DNA sample she was able to narrow the contributors to two people.
Roommate’s role and legal trade-offs
State Bureau of Investigation Agent Brian Davis testified that Twiggs was interviewed twice during the probe and received immunity so his statements could not be used against him in a criminal case. Prosecutors say Twiggs’ remarks include what Robinson allegedly told him about the shooting.
Robinson’s lawyers argued those repeated statements could be presented to jurors as if they were a confession by their client, potentially tilting the jury against him if media outlets later broadcast the audio. Family attorneys and news organizations urged transparency, saying public access to the evidence is important to maintain trust in the judicial process.
Jeffrey Neiman, representing Kirk’s family, told the judge that withholding court-recorded statements risks eroding confidence in a system that should be open.
Charges, possible penalties and next steps
Prosecutors say Robinson climbed onto a rooftop near the event where Kirk was speaking and fired a single shot that struck Kirk in the neck as he took questions from the crowd. Kirk died after being taken to a hospital.
The state has indicated the act endangered others at the campus event — a factor that qualifies as an aggravating circumstance under Utah law and could make the case eligible for the death penalty. Prosecutors also seek sentence enhancements alleging the shooting was motivated by Kirk’s political views.
Defense attorney Richard Novak has challenged the suggestion Robinson targeted Kirk for ideological reasons and asked the court to exclude evidence about the political organization hosting the event. The preliminary hearing is scheduled to continue, with the judge expected to rule after the weeklong process on whether to send the case to a jury.
Judge Graf said Thursday’s hearing will include the redacted audio, and he will decide later whether the prosecution has established probable cause to try Robinson on the aggravated murder charge.
