Show summary Hide summary
A court recording played Thursday revealed that the man accused of killing political activist Charlie Kirk told his partner the day after the shooting that he regretted what happened — a statement prosecutors say, together with chat logs and physical evidence, helps link the defendant to the crime. The disclosures deepen legal pressure on the accused and set the stage for a September hearing that will determine whether the case moves forward toward trial and potentially a capital sentence.
Evidence shown in court
Prosecutors presented a redacted video of an interview with the defendant’s romantic partner, identified as Lance Twiggs, in which Twiggs described an emotional exchange at the couple’s apartment in southern Utah the day after Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University. Authorities say the interview included a statement from the partner that the defendant expressed remorse.
Kara Swisher reshaped Silicon Valley: now positioning herself to influence the 2028 campaign
Cyclospora infection: woman recounts brutal symptoms and long recovery
Investigators also displayed digital messages they attribute to the suspect, including a post on the Discord platform shortly before he turned himself in in which he acknowledged being at the campus event. In addition, prosecutors introduced physical evidence recovered from the scene: fragments and ammunition linked to the weapon, some of which bore offensive engravings, according to court filings.
The prosecution further disclosed a handwritten note they say the defendant showed Twiggs, in which the writer said he had an opportunity to kill Kirk and acted on it, and added that he wished the act had not felt necessary. Prosecutors say other texts show the motive was tied to anger over Kirk’s public views.
- Recorded interview: Twiggs’ statements were played in court in redacted form after legal debate.
- Online admission: A Discord message allegedly posted by the suspect took responsibility for being at the UVU event.
- Physical evidence: Bullet fragments and ammunition connected to the shooting; engravings on rounds were described by prosecutors as taunting and insulting.
- Handwritten note and texts: Prosecutors say both contain admissions and references to motive.
- Forensic questions: Ballistics testing on a recovered fragment yielded inconclusive results; defense has challenged DNA links reported by investigators.
Defense objections and courtroom reaction
Defense lawyers argued the public airing of Twiggs’ interview and the chat room messages would allow prosecutors to portray the material as a confession, undermining the defendant’s right to a fair trial. The judge permitted a redacted version of the video and allowed some parts to be presented only as audio.
The courtroom showed moments of high emotion: the accused’s family sat nearby as messages were read aloud and a family member was visibly upset. The defense pressed forensic issues in court, with an attorney questioning whether ballistics testing supported the prosecution’s weapon-link conclusions; an ATF expert described some of those test results as inconclusive.
Legal stakes and next steps
Prosecutors have charged the defendant with aggravated murder and are pursuing the death penalty, citing aggravating factors that include the risk posed to other attendees at the campus event and alleged political targeting of the victim. The judge is scheduled to hear further arguments and decide whether the case will proceed to trial on Sept. 1.
Twiggs, who spoke to investigators on Sept. 12 and again in April, was granted immunity for his statements. Authorities say the shooting occurred from a rooftop near the venue while Kirk was taking audience questions; Kirk was transported to a hospital and later pronounced dead.
Responses from Kirk’s circle
Family members and several prominent conservative allies of Kirk attended Thursday’s hearing. Friends described the new material as significant and said it strengthened their confidence in the prosecution’s case, while also expressing frustration at the slow pace of legal proceedings.
One attendee said seeing the forensic exhibits and witness accounts was emotionally difficult but reinforced a focus on obtaining a thorough legal resolution.
What to watch next: whether the judge finds sufficient cause to bind the accused over for trial, how the court rules on contested evidence, and whether prosecutors move forward with seeking a capital sentence. Those outcomes will shape the path and timing of what is likely to be a high-profile criminal prosecution.
